A change of course or an ‘action replay’ in South Africa?

Print this page

There have been sounds of discontent coming out of South Africa this week, as AfriSam and PPC continue to (apparently) fail to come to an agreement on the terms of their long-discussed proposed merger. The pair have formally been in discussion since February 2017 but the situation now looks precarious. AfriSam has cancelled the heads of terms that had stood since that month. PPC has now hit back by giving AfriSam until this Friday (1 September 2017) to come up with a new and ‘sufficiently interesting’ deal for it and its shareholders. AfriSam’s acting Chief Executive Rob Wessels said, "AfriSam remains firm that a transaction between AfriSam and PPC will greatly benefit the stakeholders of both companies.” However, PPC’s chairperson Peter Nelson said that his shareholders were ‘frightened about the prospect’ of the merger.

If you think all of this to-and-fro sounds a bit familiar, that’s because it should. AfriSam and PPC have been courting not just since February 2017, but since December 2014. At that time, following the surprise resignation of CEO Ketso Gordhan, discussions lasted until the end of March 2015 before fizzling out. PPC’s (then) new CEO Daryll Castle confirmed that neither party could agree on terms. The two parties were also able to save some face by pointing out that the merged entity would have had around 60% of all South African cement capacity. While this is a pretty big potential stumbling block, it would been pretty obvious before discussions started and is by no means insurmountable. One gets the feeling that, given more enthusiastic partners, the discussions might have found a way forward.

At the time PPC and AfriSam played their cards close to their chests and we can’t be sure quite why the discussions really broke down. However, regardless of what happened last time, there do appear to be a lot of parallels with the current situation.

Firstly, PPC is, once again, in a state of transition. CEO Darryll Castle announced in July 2017 that he would be leaving to ‘pursue other interests,’ although neither an exact departure date nor destination was provided. Johan Claassen, the current managing director of PPC, has been appointed to the role, but only on an interim basis, presumably in anticipation for the expected merger. Other positions in the group’s executive team were reshuffled in the past couple of weeks and there was also the resignation of Tito Mboweni, a non-executive director, rumoured to be over a difference of opinion regarding the merger. On top of this, AfriSam’s CEO Wessels is also on a short-term contract. Could all of these pre-merger moves now be in vain?

Secondly, PPC continues to suffer from a combination of a poor domestic construction market and increasing competition and from imports coming in from rampantly over-productive markets across the Indian Ocean. Arguably both of these effects are now worse than they were in 2015, although PPC did recently say that the second quarter of 2017 had been a lot better across South Africa than the first. However, PPC saw its full-year earnings collapse by 93% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2017, after it was awarded ‘junk’ status in May 2016 by credit-rating agencies. Is it this result alone that has gotten AfriSam thinking? Despite this, PPC remains the larger of the two parties. It certainly wants to be seen to be calling the shots with its 1 September ultimatum.

However, the two producers now share less than 50% of the integrated cement capacity in South Africa, not 60% as in 2015. According to the Global Cement Directory 2017 they share around 7.8Mt/yr of integrated capacity against 8Mt/yr in the hands of others. This is due to the commissioning of the monster 3.5Mt/yr Anganang clinker plant and associated Delmas grinding plant by Sephaku Cement (Dangote Cement) and the full commissioning of Mamba Cement, part of Jidong Development. Could this smaller combined market share make it easier for PPC and AfriSam to identify those assets that can be sold to appease the competition authorities? Could this yet save the discussions?

Whatever happens after Friday, it is apparent that some form of consolidation is essential for PPC (and the wider southern African market) if the industry is to ‘right-size’ for the future. The region is awash with cement. News from PPC Zimbabwe this week even hinted that the effects of imports are now so strong in that country that it is considering shutting down clinker production at its Colleen Bawn plant, which has operated for more than 70 years. This effect is in play all the way down the coast from the Horn of Africa to Capetown and has been discussed previously with reference to Kenya, Tanzania and Mozambique.

Even if it doesn’t get the ‘right answer’ from AfriSam this week, PPC may still stand to gain from the merger, even if it’s only in the short term. In March 2015 its shares jumped up 5% on the news that the merger talks had collapsed. Given its recent performance, another 5% boost would probably not be turned down.

Register for the Global Cement Weekly email newsletter

Global Cement Weekly is Global Cement’s weekly email newsletter. Keep up to date with cement industry news, analysis, diary dates and news of people in the sector.

Register >

URL: https://www.globalcement.com/news/item/6492-a-change-of-course-or-an-action-replay-in-south-africa

© 2022 Pro Global Media Ltd. All rights reserved.