Displaying items by tag: McInnis Cement
Canada: McCinnis Cement's US$1.1bn cement plant, which is under construction in Quebec's Gaspe region, could be cancelled if work is suspended in order to conduct environmental hearings.
Lafarge Canada and two non-profit groups mounted a legal challenge in the summer of 2013 after Quebec's environment minister authorised the project without an environmental assessment hearing. In a legal filing McInnis said that the project is subject to old environmental rules that were in place when it was first proposed more than 20 years ago.
Successive provincial governments have confirmed many times that the project is not subject to current rules that require such hearings.
Canada: McInnis Cement has announced that the financial structure of its cement plant under construction in the Gaspé Region of Quebec has been completed. The National Bank of Canada, as the sole book-runner of the bank syndicate, has confirmed the availability of a US$329m loan for the project. This is in addition to the US$458m in equity from private and public investors, including the joint venture formed by Groupe Beaudier and La Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, as well as the participation of Investissement Québec (IQ). IQ has also provided a US$229m commercial loan, which brings the loan total to US$1.00bn.
"We are pleased that the project can be realised without any subsidy; we are also very proud to be able to complete, more than 30 years after it was imagined by local entrepreneurs, this visionary, ambitious and modern cement plant at the cutting edge of technology." said Christian Gagnon, CEO of McInnis Cement. "Construction has begun and the project is well under way. Moreover, the ecological footprint of this flagship project for the cement industry in Canada and across the world will be one of the lowest in the industry."
The plant will use up to 40% less fuel per tonne of cement than traditional cement plants due the use of hydroelectric power, reducing emissions of greenhouse gas. It will comply with the US standards set out in the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP 2015), which are more stringent than those presently applied in Quebec. For example, the NESHAP 2015 standard for particulate matter is 15 times lower than the current Quebec limit. The Port-Daniel cement plant will be the only one in Canada to comply with the NESHAP 2015 standards.
The plant will be equipped with state-of-the-art technology for improved environmental performance, including the latest generation of bag filters for improved efficiency. It will also utilise maritime transportation for fuel, further reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Initially, the plant will use petroleum coke as fuel, although this is set to change in due course.
"Over the coming years, we intend to further reduce greenhouse gas emissions by partly replacing the petroleum coke with biomass, which is available in the Gaspé region," said Gagnon. "This partial conversion to biomass is at the very heart of the concept of the cement plant."
USA/Canada: US Senator Sherrod Brown has urged the Obama Administration to protect the cement industry in Paulding County, Ohio and the thousands of local jobs that it supports.
In a letter to United States Trade Representative (USTR) Michael Froman, Brown called for the administration to crack down on Canada's attempt to 'illegally' subsidise the McInnis Cement plant in Quebec, which would specifically target the US market, hurting the ability of local manufacturers to compete. US cement companies would be affected, he claims, including Lafarge North America, which has a plant in Paulding County.
"Paulding County workers can compete with anyone when given a level playing field," said Brown. "But if countries like Canada illegally subsidise their industries and target the US market, it gives their products an unfair advantage. I urge the administration to investigate the nearly US$500m subsidy package proposed for the Quebec plant, which will directly compete with Lafarge North America's facility in Paulding. Actions must be taken in order to protect Paulding jobs and the economy of north-west Ohio."
The Canadian federal government and Quebec are seeking to offer almost US$500m to McInnis Cement to help its start-up in Port-Daniel-Gascons, Quebec. It is claimed that the size and nature of these subsidies could violate Canada's World Trade Organisation (WTO) obligations and give its cement industry an unfair advantage in the US market.
"Lafarge North America appreciates the inquiry to the United States Trade Representative to address a serious threat to US cement producers and their workers," said John Stull, president and CEO of Lafarge North America. "Given the excess cement capacity in Quebec, the McInnis Cement plant makes no economic sense. Lafarge believes that the plant would not be built without enormous support from the federal and provincial government. Lafarge joins Senator Brown in urging the US government to engage with the Canadian government regarding the provision of subsidies that appear to be prohibited by WTO rules and threaten material harm to the US cement industry."
Canada: Quebec's US$350m investment in a new cement plant from Bombardier's founding family in the job-starved Gaspé region is a 'terrible deal' that could end up being a 'financial sinkhole' for taxpayers, according to the Province's Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) opposition party.
CAQ has called on Quebec to renegotiate the agreement with McInnis Cement, which is owned by the Bombardier-Beaudoin family. The party said that it saw a copy of the confidential agreement and that private investors, notably the family, are only putting in US$62m of money to gain majority control of the project, while Quebec will contribute several times that amount but will only get a minority stake.
In January 2014 McInnis announced plans for a US$1bn cement plant in Port-Daniel-Gascons that would produce 2.2Mt/yr of cement, largely for export by ship to the US. The project was being billed as a saviour for the chronically under-employed Gaspé region because it will support 1500 construction jobs and provide work for 200 permanent plant employees.
CAQ said that Pauline Marois's Parti Québécois government had by-passed Investissement Québec, the province's investment arm and ordered that the money be disbursed without analysis by Investissement's board. Quebec confirmed that it would provide McInnis with an interest-bearing loan of US$250m and take a US$100m equity stake in the company.
The federal government also contributed US$100m to the project through split participation by Export Development Canada and the Business Development Bank of Canada. This is senior-ranking debt, to be repaid first in the event of a default, and part of a larger banking group that included National Bank.
"The federal government decided that it couldn't risk taking equity or subordinate debt like Quebec did," said CAQ economy and external trade critic Stéphane Le Bouyonnec. "The reason is simple; the industry is already in a situation of overcapacity. We predict that this transaction could become a financial sinkhole, a disaster for the government of Quebec."
A December 2013 study on the cement market by independent economist Colin Sutherland concluded that adding McInnis's capacity to the mix could delay the return of a healthy supply-demand balance in north-eastern North America well beyond the expected date of 2021. At the moment, Quebec has about 1.2Mt/yr of unused capacity while eastern Pennsylvania and New York have about 0.6Mt/yr, meaning many plants are operating well below maximum volume.
"The rationale for this deal is not sound," said Michael McSweeney, president of the Cement Association of Canada. "When this project goes ahead, it will just shift jobs from other parts of Quebec to the Gaspé."
Quebec Premier Pauline Marois defended the agreement, calling it a 'good project' in which the government is demanding a higher interest rate than normal because it understands the risk.
The McInnis Cement announcement of 31 January 2014 can be found here.
Unfair competition in Canada
05 February 2014On 31 January 2014, the Québec government announced that it would invest US$350m in a new US$1bn, 2.2Mt/yr cement plant and port facility, to be operated by McInnis Cement at Port-Daniel. To say that this has prompted outrage in the industry is an understatement. Rival cement producers, including Lafarge and Ciments Québec have been unanimous in condemning the funding, which they see as an unjustified affront to fair competition in the province's cement industry. There was an angry response on the Global Cement LinkedIn Group, with dissatisfaction on a number of levels.
Firstly, established manufacturers highlight that the Québec cement market is in a slump, with 100-150 members of Métallos, the United Steelworkers union, currently on rolling temporary furloughs at any one time. There is over-capacity as it is. How will another cement plant help this situation? One contributor to the Global Cement LinkedIn Group said that the funding was like, "Taking the money I pay as taxes to break my legs." Another said, "Imagine our tax dollars heavily subsidising our direct competitor - totally unacceptable!"
Secondly, the government will have a direct interest in the cement industry, diverting public funds to a sector that (in the West) is traditionally left to its own devices. What does the government have to gain from this move? Well, there are suggestions that the awarding of future government cement and concrete contracts can no longer be fair due to the rather obvious conflict of interest. Could the government effectively award contracts to itself? Arguments from the government and McInnis that its distribution will be outside the areas served by the other plants don't seem to wash with the established producers.
Thirdly, there are fingers pointed at the Gaspasia paper mill project, a failed government-funded installation that was not established in the 1990s at a cost to the taxpayer of US$300m. It is unlikely that any of the parties involved would like to see a repeat at Port-Daniel.
Finally, the Canadian government appears to have turned its back on its own 'Wood First' policy, signed in April 2013, which stated that wood should be preferred in construction over cement and steel due to environmental concerns over embodied CO2. At the time Canadian cement manufacturers were at pains to point out that cement and concrete constructions were actually sustainable in comparison to many other building materials, especially with repect to long-term use and minimisation of energy consumed during a building's lifespan. At worst this seems to be a government U-turn but it could yet get more ugly. Now, with funding for new cement capacity, Québec appears to have 'listened' to the cement producers. How long before some cynics point to this change as evidence that the government wanted McInnis Cement to happen all along?
Whether a gross miscalculation or a deliberate ploy by the government, the McInnis Cement saga will not be going away. Ciments Québec and Lafarge will line up to fight the decision and, in litigation-heavy North America, this story could run and run.
Controversial Canadian plant gets government cash
31 January 2014Canada: It has been announced that a controversial new US$1bn cement plant and marine terminal, to be constructed by McInnis Cement, will be part financed by the Quebec government and two provincial agencies. The authorities will inject US$350m into the Port-Daniel facility. The other US$650m will be provided by McInnis Cement, which is owned by the Beaudoin/Bombardier family that also controls Bombardier Inc, and aircraft and rolling stock manufacturer.
The McInnis project is scheduled to produce 2Mt/yr and will employ about 2400 workers during the construction phase. The plant will employ around 400 people directly and indirectly by 2016, when it is scheduled to start operations. The company has access to a 450Mt limestone reserve.
A union official who represents about 500 workers at two existing cement plants in St-Constant and St-Basile-de-Portneuf reacted with outrage to the project. "Our members are very angry," said Daniel Roy, Quebec director of Métallos, the United Steelworkers union. "We just don't get it. The cement industry is already in an overcapacity situation and at any given time, between 100 and 150 of our members are sitting at home on temporary furlough. Here they are announcing a huge project like that. It will inevitably mean layoffs at our current plants."
Another irritated party is Lafarge, which has long complained that the McInnis project would benefit unfairly from Quebec taxpayer money and would further distort the market, which already has oversupply. In September 2013 a Lafarge executive warned that the four established players, itself, Colacem, Holcim and Ciment Québec, would be unfairly disadvantaged.