Displaying items by tag: Slovenia

Slovenia: Lafarge said that the country's environment inspectorate has ordered the plant to suspend operations as it lacks environmental permits. The inspectorate acted following a recent decision from the European Commission to refer Slovenia to the European Court of Justice for failing to issue an industrial permit to a major cement plant. The Commission is also asking for fines to be imposed.

Lafarge said in a statement on its website that it will respect the decision and shut down the kiln on 5 March 2015, but would lodge a complaint with the Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning. Lafarge said that in the process of obtaining the required licences, it had operated in accordance with all relevant environmental standards and that numerous studies have shown that the plant does not have a major impact on local air quality. It also stressed that it had invested more than Euro33m to modernise the plant since it was bought by Lafarge some 13 years ago.

Slovenia: Slovenia faces EU judicial proceedings for its alleged failure to fully-implement a system of environmental permits for its large industrial plants. The case referred to the EU Court of Justice relates to one of the country's two cement producers, which continues to operate without permits.

The Commission said that matter would be referred to the court for failure to implement provisions of the integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC) directive of 2007, which requires that industrial plants be licensed to verify that they meet strict environmental controls. It is the second time that Slovenia has faced EU court action over the IPPC directive, after the Court of Justice found in 2010 that Slovenia was running afoul rules requiring that all plants meet the set requirements.

The EU is seeking a base fine of Euro1.6m for the country plus Euro9009 for each day that the violation persists. The Slovenian Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning said that it was, "Striving to implement as quickly as possible the alleged violations of EU law." Licenses under the IPPC directive became a requirement for member states as of 30 October 2007. According to the Commission, Slovenia has made considerable progress since the 2010 ruling, but full compliance with the judgement has still not been reached.

The new case concerns 'a major cement factory,' which continues to operate without a permit. While it avoided naming the plant, Slovenia has two cement plants owned by Salonit Anhovo and Lafarge. Whereas Salonit Anhovo is a licensed IPPC plant, Lafarge is involved in lengthy bureaucratic and legal proceedings in seeking a permit. It has faced ongoing protests from local groups against it being granted a license. Despite not having a license, the plant continues to operate.

The Environment Ministry said that one of the factors influencing the length of procedures was a ruling by an administrative court in Slovenia demanding that Lafarge's plant be treated as a new facility rather than an existing installation. The Environment Agency, which issues permits, is therefore obliged to complete all procedures prescribed for licensing of new plants.

CRH has made good on its intentions. This week it stumped up Euro6.5bn to buy assets from Lafarge and Holcim in four continents. The move follows preparation since at least May 2014 when the Irish building materials group announced a divestment programme. In October 2014 it announced that it would sell its brickwork division.

CRH is finding the cash through a mix of existing cash, debt and equity placing. Interestingly, back in 2012 an Irish stockbroking analyst who was interviewed reckoned that the company could spend up to Euro3.5bn on acquisitions whilst remaining within its banking agreements. Throw in the recent sales and planned divestments and the planned acquisition from LafargeHolcim doesn't seem like too much of a stretch for CRH.

If completed, the purchase will see CRH take on 24 cement plants with a production capacity of 36Mt/yr. As a back of the envelope calculation suggests the sale price of Euro6.5bn isn't far off the occasionally used price of US$200/t for western cement production. The deal also includes aggregates, ready mixed concrete and asphalt assets.

The purchase marks a change in CRH's buying strategy both in terms of scale and distribution. Much of CRH's previous acquisitions have been minority shareholdings that make it difficult to accurately report the company's position in the cement industry. For example, in our Top 100 Report CRH was reported to have a production capacity of 6.49Mt/yr for majority shareholdings with another 19.9Mt/yr for minority shareholdings. The new cement capacity being purchased blows this away because it more than doubles CRH's total capacity and it appears to be all majority owned. CRH thinks that this will propel it to become the world's third biggest building materials manufacturer after LafargeHolcim and Saint-Gobain, leapfrogging Cemex and HeidelbergCement in the process. Strangely there is no mention of the huge Chinese players in the top five manufacturers in CRH's acquisition presentation.

CRH has avoided buying plants in southern Europe but it is relying on the slowly improving growing UK market, where CRH will pick up four plants, to balance the risk. Elsewhere in Europe, the three Holcim plants in France have been suffering from continued low construction rates in that country and the two Lafarge cement plants in Romania are unlikely to have recovered from a production fall in 2013. Outside of Europe growth has been poor in Quebec in 2013 and 2014, where CRH is buying two plants from Holcim. Both Lafarge and Holcim have also seen a slowdown in Brazil. However, the Philippines does seem like a better bet for CRH, with solid cement volumes growth seen by Lafarge in 2013 and the first three quarters of 2014.

With CRH now looking like a company that wants to produce cement rather than one that owns parts of companies that produce cement, all eyes are on the construction markets. 14 of the 24 cement plants CRH are buying are in Europe. Buying at the bottom of a sustained production slump makes sense because the asking price will be low. However, has the bottom been reached yet?

Slovenia: The Lafarge Trbovlje cement plant is among several industrial sites and facilities in Slovenia that have been added to the Global Atlas of Environmental Justice, an interactive online mapping platform detailing environmental conflicts around the world. Its originators seek to highlight incidences of water and land competition as well as air, water and other pollution.

"The Atlas illustrates how ecological conflicts are increasing around the world, driven by material demands fed primarily by the rich and middle class subsections of the global population," said project coordinator Joan Martinez-Alier of the Autonomous University of Barcelona.

Italy/Slovenia: Buzzi Unicem has completed a strategic agreement with Austria's Wietersdorfer & Peggauer, which was initially announced in February 2014. Under the terms of the deal, W&P Cementi, Wietersdorfer & Peggauer's Italian subsidiary, has acquired Buzzi Unicem's 0.3Mt/yr cement plant in Cadola, Belluno Province, Italy. W&P Cementi has also won the right to purchase Buzzi Unicem's 0.4Mt/yr cement plant in Travesio, Pordenone Province, Italy within the next five years for Euro22m. At the same time, Buzzi Unicem has paid Euro22m for a 25% stake in W&P Cementi and a 25% stake in Salonit Anhovo, Wietersdorfer & Peggauer's Slovenian subsidiary.

Slovenia: A local environmental non-government organisation (NGO), Eko Krog, which has been fighting Lafarge in the city of Trbovlje for years, has launched a challenge to the environmental permit issued to Lafarge in January 2014.

Eko Krog stated that that the basis for issuing the environmental permit for the operations of the cement factory was flawed and that the permit will result in new pollution in the Trbovlje valley. It has appealed to the Ministry of Agriculture and the Environment, which will now have to review the Environment Agency's (ARSO) decision to issue the permit.

ARSO said that the permit for unlimited cement production at the plant meets EU rules. However, Eko Krog has branded the decision was flawed, as key potential emissions were omitted, including those generated at the nearby quarry. Eko Krog also claimed that the documentation for the permit contains other flaws, including the failure to respect all of the recommendations of internationally-adopted standards for use of the best technology in the cement industry.

It is unclear how long the review of the permit by the relevant ministry will take, but Eko Krog has already once succeeded in having Lafarge stripped of the permit. Lafarge first received the permit in 2009, at which time it had invested Euro33m in upgrades, but its plans to use alternative fuels in its kiln subsequently prompted anger among locals and led to the successful challenge of the permit by Eko Krog in 2011. As a result, the plant had to scale down operations, making the January 2014 decision by the Environment Agency a major victory for Lafarge.

The plant responded to the decision by labelling it a first step in restarting cement production and obtaining a permit for the use of alternative fuels, which would be crucial for Lafarge's sustainability in Slovenia.