Displaying items by tag: Fair Competition Tribunal
Tribunal nullifies latest Fair Competition Commission approval of Scancem’s acquisition of Tanga Cement
19 October 2023Tanzania: The Fair Competition Tribunal (FCT) lamented the ‘mischief prevailing in the market’ in a ruling nullifying the Fair Competition Commission (FCC)’s approval of Scancem International’s planned acquisition of a 68% stake in Tanga Cement, dated 28 February 2023. The Citizen newspaper has reported that the FCT granted the parties leave to apply for a review of its earlier decision of 23 September 2022, in which it initially rejected the attempted deal. In its latest judgment, the tribunal drew on principles from South African law to show that companies should be able to submit a new application within one year of rejection, provided there is a ‘substantial change’ of circumstances or market dynamics. The court added that no blame lay with the parties for having lodged their second attempted merger notification within such a timeframe.
Tanzania: The Tanzania Fair Competition Tribunal (FCT) has ruled that Heidelberg Materials subsidiary Scancem International cannot acquire Tanga Cement from AfriSam at present. The Fair Competition Committee had previously approved the acquisition to proceed in February 2023. In its latest ruling, the FCT found that the commission had not been within its powers to set aside a previous court ruling of the FCT, dated September 2022. The FCT acknowledged that the market situation may have changed since its first ruling, but underlined the need for legal procedure.
Judge Salma Maghimbi said “The act or conduct of the two respondents did not send a good message to the public, nor to potential investors who would have been interested in coming to invest in our country.”
Tanzanian government explains approval of acquisition of Tanga Cement by Heidelberg Materials
10 May 2023Tanzania: The government has defended its support for the acquisition of a majority stake in Tanga Cement by a subsidiary of Heidelberg Materials. In 2021 Scancem International, a subsidiary of Heidelberg Materials, agreed to buy a 68% share of Tanga Cement from AfriSam for around US$59m. The Fair Competition Commission (FCC) provisionally approved the deal but the Fair Competition Tribunal (FCT) blocked it in late 2022 following lobbying by Chalinze Cement and the Tanzania Consumer Advocacy Society on the grounds that it would potentially reduce market competition, according to the Citizen newspaper. However, Scancem International applied again to the FCC in December 2022 to push through the agreement. This motion was then approved in February 2023.
During a parliamentary debate on the issue in early May 2023 Ashatu Kijaji, the Minister for Industry and Trade, defended the decision to re-approve the deal on the grounds that the approved merger application was different from the one rejected by the FCT. However, other members of parliament were sceptical about the decision.
Competition body blocks Heidelberg Materials’ acquisition of majority stake in Tanga Cement
12 October 2022Tanzania: The Fair Competition Tribunal (FCT) has blocked an attempt by Heidelberg Materials to buy a 68% stake in Tanga Cement for around US$59m saying it was contrary to the law. The Germany-based building materials producer announced in October 2021 that it had agreed to buy Tanga Cement from South Africa-based AfriSam via various subsidiaries, according to the Citizen newspaper. The Fair Competition Commission (FCC) provisionally approved the transaction but required the buyer to keep the operations of Tanga Cement running, to continue producing and promoting the Simba Cement (Tanga Cement) brand and to keep employing the existing staff at Tanga Cement. However, Chalinze Cement Limited and the Tanzania Consumer Advocacy Society opposed the decision due to a potential reduction in market competition and successfully made an appeal to the FCT.
In a statement Tanga Cement said that Heidelberg Materials and AfriSam were, “considering how to proceed, but the FCT ruling has placed the acquisition at great risk of not being implemented.” It added that the parties were waiting for a formal ruling from the FCT and would then seek further advice on how to proceed.