August 2025

A member of the Global Cement LinkedIn Group commented this week on the merger between China National Building Material (CNBM) and China National Materials (Sinoma).

“Has the cement world got used to gigantic mergers or have we failed to understand how big this thing is locally, regionally and globally? It is shocking to see how little publicity and media attention is paid to this merger in comparison to the past ones. I find this to be potentially a game changer for the industry. This time, the game will be drawn from a single corner with less integration pains and much more alignment. A big wave coming…”

The comment was posted by Pavel Cech, a managing director of ResourceCo Asia based in Kuala Lumpur. This company is a waste recycling and waste management concern that specialises in alternative fuels for the cement industry. So a focus on the potentially massive drive for co-processing by the Chinese industry is understandable compared to, say, other companies in other continents. However, Cech’s point is valid: why isn’t this merger being talked about more?

CNBM is the largest cement company in the country with a reported total production capacity of around 406Mt/yr. Sinoma is a cement engineering company and the fourth largest cement producer in China with a total production capacity of approximately 112Mt/yr. The companies formally agreed to merge in September 2017 as part of a state-mandated industry consolidation. If these figures are taken at face value then the merger should increase the lead of the self-declared world’s biggest cement producer.

In non-Chinese terms this would be like HeidelbergCement merging with a major equipment manufacturer like ThyssenKrupp or FLSmidth. For these kind of companies, industry commentators and press, such as a Global Cement Magazine, would spend many column inches discussing the twists and turns of the merger as it played out. Just compare the Chinese merger to the debacle that has played out with the proposed acquisition of South Africa’s PPC by Fairfax, where seemingly every development was expounded upon both by PPC and the press.

For Global Cement’s reporting and coverage on China, problems arise from language difficulties, differences with the way Chinese media covers industry, the state-controlled aspect of many of the larger producers, issues obtaining accurate industry data and the sheer size of the sector. All of these impediments make it harder to cover the Chinese market. Add the relative insularity of the sector and it’s often easy to give the Chinese cement industry a special label, separating it out when talking about the global cement industry as a whole.

All this may be about to change as Chinese cement producers start firing up their own kilns outside of the motherland as part of the ‘One Belt, One Road’ initiative, making it easier to see what Chinese companies are doing. Except that Sinoma has already been out there in the rest of world building cement plants in many developing markets and creating competition for the Europe-based equipment manufacturers.

There has been little attention from competition bodies outside of China about the merger. The South Korean Fair Trade Commission approved the deal in November 2017 and that’s been about it. Combining a cement plant builder with a cement producer is a clear example of vertical integration in the cement industry. There is nothing necessarily anti-competitive about this but it could change the market dynamic where non-Chinese multinational and Chinese cement producers compete. If both CNBM and a rival wanted to open build a plant in the same area, then the competitor to CNBM might have less choice when it came to picking their equipment supplier. In addition, news stories such as the alleged pressure by the Chinese embassy in Sri Lanka to try and force a local development agency to choose Sinoma to build a grinding plant doesn’t instil confidence that a merged CNBM-Sinoma would play nice. Although, as today’s fine by the Colombian competition body to Cementos Argos, Cemex and Holcim for price fixing shows, non-Chinese cement producers are just as prone to malpractice.

The merger of CNBM and Sinoma is undeniably big news in the industry. Both within and outside China it is likely to have a pronounced effect. As explained above, for various reasons, the western press can’t cover China in the same way it does other countries. Once the Chinese producers start building more plants outside of China then this is likely to change significantly. Until then we’ll do our best to keep track of this and other Chinese news stories.

Spain: Vicente Pedro has been appointed as the new plant manager of Lafarge Spain’s Montcada i Reixac plant near Barcelona. He succeeds José Luis Coleto, who will take over the management of the Sagunto plant in Valencia, according to the Crónica Global newspaper.

Pedro trained as an industrial engineer at the Universitat Politècnica de València. He has worked for LafargeHolcim and its predecessor companies for over 30 years spending time at plants at Spain, Venezuela and Brazil. More recently he has managed the company’s capital expenditure projects in Spain.

Germany: Markus Bochynek is to leave the management board of Aucotec in April 2018. His responsibility for sales and marketing will be taken over by fellow board member Uwe Vogt. The other board member, chief executive officer (CEO) Horst Beran, will remain in post. The existing management team below the management board will assume some of the previous responsibilities and tasks of Vogt and Bochynek.

The engineering software company is also planning to build a new head office in 2018.

FLSmidth revealed this week that Cooperativa Boliviana de Cemento, Industrias y Servicios (COBOCE) has ordered a cement mill for its Irpa Irpa plant near Cochabamba. The Danish engineering firm was pleased to note that with the sale it has now delivered mills to three of the country’s five producers. Other recent orders include supplying an OK 36-4 mill to Sociedad Boliviana de Cemento’s (SOBOCE) Viacha cement plant, announced in early 2016, and a sale of a complete integrated production line at Sucre to Fábrica Nacional de Cemento (FANCESA) in late 2016.

These order reveal slow but steady growth in the local industry in recent years. However, a slowdown so far in 2017 suggests that the market is changing. National Institute of Statistics of Bolivia (INE) data shows that sales in the local market broke down in 2016 into a 42% sales share for SOBOCE, 25% for FANCESA, 19% for COBOCE, 8% for Yura and 6% for Itacamba. This changed somewhat in the first quarter of 2017 with a reduction in the sales of SOBOCE and Yura. Sales in the country are concentrated in the departments of Chuquisca, La Paz and Cochabamba, which held 70% of cement sales in 2016.

Graph 1: Cement production and sales in Bolivia, 2012 – 2017. Source: National Institute of Statistics of Bolivia.

Annual cement sales in Bolivia have been growing consistently since 2001. Financial services company Pacific Credit Rating placed average annual sales growth at 7.72% from 1998 to 2016. In 2016 sales reached 3.7Mt. Graph 1 shows a continuation of this trend although the first half of 2017 has been weaker than 2016. COBOCE blamed the reverse in 2017 on reduced local government spending on infrastructure projects and poor weather. The producer was expecting sales to grow by 6 – 8% as a whole for 2017. However, on the basis of the figures for July and August 2017 this is not looking likely. Sales for the two months dropped by 2.5% year-on-year to 0.64Mt. A representative of FANCESA later blamed the market change on a reduction in sales supporting the construction of tall buildings in the country’s key markets as customers switched to buying ‘random’ volumes.

Sure enough local producers have started to complain about foreign exporters damaging their trade. A union head in Chuquisaca called for cement and clinker imports by Yura from Peru to be banned and concerns have been raised about concessions offered to Itacamba, a joint venture between Spain’s Cementos Molins, Brazil’s Votorantim Cement and Camba Cement. President Evo Morales inaugurated this company’s new plant in Yacuses, Santa Cruz in early 2017. The niggles about foreign exports to Bolivia seem counter-intuitive given that the country is landlocked and it has the world’s highest capital city above sea level. Usually, markets with nearby ports are most at risk from clinker and cement imports. Yet, Itacamba was planning exports to Argentina in November so the import and export markets via road and river links can’t be discounted.

Cement sales may be down so far in 2017 but overall the wider economy appears to be in rude health. After a strong decade of growth the national Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate has fallen each year since 2014, but it was still 4.3% in 2016, one of the highest in South America. If that kind of growth persists it seems unlikely that the cement industry will have trouble for long.

China: Xu Weibing has been appointed as the supervisor and chairman of supervisory committee at China National Building Material (CNBM) following shareholder approval. Her term will last until the end of May 2019. She replaces Wu Jiwei.

Xu, aged 58 years, holds over 30 years of experience in financial accounting and capital operation. She has worked as the chief accountant of CNBM since May 2017 and was its deputy general manager prior to that. She graduated from Liaoning Finance and Economics Institute in 1983 with a bachelor’s degree, majoring in finance, and is a senior accountant.

Chile: Cementos Bío Bío has appointed Katia Trusich as director and member of the Directors Committee. Her appointment follows the resignation of André Roberto Leitão. Trusich has held of number of private and public sector roles, including working as the Under Secretary of Economics for the Chilean government between 2014 and 2016. Most recently she has been the Corporate Affairs Manager for CGE.

There are two significant cement producers around the world up for sale at the moment. Last week we dealt with India’s Binani Cement, which has so far attracted 15 separate bids from a number of international and domestic players. Now, we turn our attention to South Africa, where PPC remains the target of approaches by LafargeHolcim and CRH.

This week PPC rejected a partial offer from Canada’s Fairfax Holdings, which it considered neither fair nor reasonable. Like a mutual friend at a party that insists two people ‘really are perfect for each other,’ Fairfax had stipulated in its terms that PPC should merge with AfriSam to create a South African super-producer. It does not appear that this idea went down well and that particular combination now seems further away than ever.

When the news broke that it had rejected Fairfax, we thought that PPC’s stance seemed a little ‘too cool.’ However, looking just at the oversized and import-addled South African market does not give the full picture of what’s happening for PPC at the moment. It has significant and growing activities in the rest of Africa too.

Later this week PPC released its results for the first half of its 2018 fiscal year. Suddenly, its handling of the Fairfax offer made more sense. Over the six months to 30 September 2017, PPC nearly tripled its profit to US$21.1m. Crucially, sales from outside South Africa grew far more rapidly than those at home. While domestic earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) rose by 4%, EBITDA from elsewhere increased by 25%. These results bode well for a potential bidding war that now favours PPC.

Even from this greatly enhanced position, PPC was not finished with its announcements for the week. Today it revealed that it plans to build a new ‘mega-factory’ in the Western Cape. Johan Claassen, the interim chief executive of PPC, said there would probably be a formal announcement about new capacity in the Western Cape in 2018. He said that PPC had decided to conduct a feasibility study into a possible replacement for its Riebeeck plant. An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is in progress and the plant is reported to be ‘semi-brownfield.’ Claassen said that the new facility would use around 25% of the current Riebeeck equipment and cost US$200/t of installed capacity.

The news of its results and announcement of the new plant represent a good PR move by PPC given the difficulties faced by the wider South African market. The new information will certainly give cause for CRH and LafargeHolcim to think again about the values of their offers, should PPC also be of the view that these also undervalue the company.

Oman: Raysut Cement has appointed Joey Ghose as its new CEO, effective 1 December 2017. Ahmed bin Yousuf bin Alawi Al Ibrahim, the chairman of Raysut Cement’s board, said in a statement to the Muscat bourse that Ghose has extensive experience of managing cement industry companies.

Azerbaijan: Frederic Guimbal was appointed director general of Holcim Azerbaijan OJSC. Guimbal took up his duties in October, replaced Rossen Papazov in this post. Prior to this role, Guimbal served as CEO of Holcim India.

India’s Economic Times (ET) has run a story today that really illustrates the heart of the current oversupply issues surrounding the cement sector in India. It reports that Binani Cement, one of the country’s many medium-sized domestic players, is circling the drain ahead of full bankruptcy proceedings. According to ‘senior officials,’ who spoke on the condition of anonymity, the company has already attracted interest from LafargeHolcim, HeidelbergCement and CRH, as well as a plethora of domestic players. There are a total of 15 interested parties so far: the three multinationals, nine domestic cement producers and three investment firms.

With 11.3Mt/yr of capacity, Binani Cement is not a small player by international standards. Unusually for an Indian producer, it even has capacity elsewhere, in China and Dubai. It is part of the larger BRAJ Binani Group, which is involved in glass fibre, energy, IT and more. The fact that the cement company is now up for sale really underscores the extent to which India doesn’t need the 100Mt/yr of extra capacity that was highlighted by the Cement Manufacturers Association in September 2017. India could lose 10 Binani Cements overnight and still have enough capacity to meet domestic demand!

Binani’s issues are, at least in part, geographic. It has assets exclusively in the north of India, which has seen weakened homebuilding and infrastructure activities since the implementation of the government’s demonetisation policy, as well as the highest impacts from rising imported fossil fuel prices. The implementation of India’s new Goods and Services Tax (GST), which has increased cement prices, has not helped. The bulk of Binani’s operations are in Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh, both states far from the coast. When even UltraTech Cement’s profit is down, the squeeze for some smaller producers is becoming too much. On its own Binani cannot handle the heat, but its assets would certainly make a nice addition for a larger player.

In this way, the consolidating Indian cement sector represents a microcosm of the global situation. Binani’s troubles highlight how much better large companies are at spreading the risks of operating in different markets. As discussed in our forthcoming December 2017 issue, the advantages of being a multinational player with a large number of geographical markets appears to be gradually returning once again, with smaller regional players once again suffering from geographical disadvantages.

Of course, in an environment ripe for consolidation it is very interesting to note that CRH is among the international players linked to Binani. It clearly wants the benefits of being a fully-fledged multinational and is going full-steam ahead to get there. It has spent Euro1.34bn on 27 acquisitions of various sizes in 2017, most notably the on-going purchase of Ash Grove Cement in the US. It is making a strong case to purchase PPC in Africa and a larger Indian base makes sense for the company in the longer term. It lost out on Lafarge India’s assets to Nirma in 2016.

We can be sure that the pace of mergers and acquisitions will continue to grow in the rest of 2017 and into 2018 in India and elsewhere. Would you bet against CRH pulling off an Ash Grove, PPC and Binani ‘triple?’ With the group finance director Senan Murphy stating that there was additional room for expansion in 2018, its intent certainly can’t be faulted.