Displaying items by tag: CRH

US: CRH has appointed Nancy Buese as its chief financial officer (CFO). She will be based in New York. She succeeds Alan Connolly in the post, who was working as interim CFO. Connolly will return to his previous role as Director of Strategic Finance in May 2025.

Buese previously worked as Executive Vice President and CFO at Baker Hughes Company and Newmont Corporation. She has also served as Executive Vice President and CFO at MarkWest Energy Partners and MPLX and was a partner at Ernst & Young. She is a graduate of the University of Kansas.

Ukraine: A court has reportedly invalidated the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine (AMCU)’s competition clearance for CRH Ukraine's acquisition of Buzzi subsidiary Dyckerhoff Cement Ukraine, completed in October 2024. Interfax-Ukraine News has reported that the court found that the clearance, granted in September 2024, was based on insufficient ‘clarification and evidence’ of details on the Ukrainian ready-to-use mortar mixes market situation.

The court allegedly also ruled that the Netherlands-based subsidiary of Ireland-based CRH had yet to meet certain commitments upon which the AMCU’s approval was conditional. Following the acquisition of Dyckerhoff Cement Ukraine, it was required to appoint executive, directorial or supervisory personnel to the company who did not already hold positions in CRH Ukraine-controlled entities. CRH clarified that it in fact appointed Mariusz Tomasz Bogacz on 11 October 2024, after his powers as a member of the supervisory board of Podilsky Cement had already been terminated, on 8 October 2024.

Building materials and property development company Kovalska Group mounted the successful legal challenge. The Kyiv Post newspaper has reported that the Kyiv-based company controls over 50% of the concrete market in Kyiv Oblast.

Dyckerhoff Cement Ukraine’s assets comprise two integrated cement plants, cement terminals and ready-mix concrete plants in Kyiv, Odessa and Mykolaiv. They entered Italy-based Buzzi’s control following the group’s progressive acquisition of Germany-based Dyckerhoff in 2001 – 2013. CRH and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development signed a mandate letter for the launch of a joint acquisition of the business in December 2023. The value of the deal was reportedly €100m.

The latest decision is currently under appeal by CRH.

This story was modified on 22 April 2025 to correct the inaccurate claim that the latest court ruling 'blocked' or ‘overturned' the completed acquisition and to add CRH's clarification regarding the effective appointment of Mariusz Tomasz Bogacz.

Boral announced this week that it had secured around US$15m from the Australian government towards decarbonisation upgrades at its Berrima cement plant in New South Wales. The funding will go towards the company’s own investment in a kiln feed optimisation project. A new specialised grinding circuit and supporting infrastructure at the site is intended to increase the proportion of alternative raw materials (ARM) from 9% to 23% to decrease the amount of limestone the kiln uses. The use of more ARMs should also enable the unit to reduce its energy intensity. Boral plans to use ARMs including granulated blast furnace slag, steel slag, cement fibre board, fly ash and fine aggregates from recycled concrete. Commissioning and full operation of the changes are scheduled for 2028.

The Berrima plant officially opened its last set of changes, including a chlorine bypass unit, in December 2024. This was done to allow the plant to reach a thermal substitution rate (TSR) of 60% by the end of 2027. At the end of 2024 the company said it had a TSR of 30% having risen by 20% from 2023. Another similar decarbonisation project at the plant is a carbon capture and storage demonstration pilot trial involving the recarbonation of construction and demolition waste.

Parent company SGH said in its annual report for 2024 that Boral was continuing to advocate for a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) to prevent carbon leakage and that it had taken part in the ongoing government review on the issue. This lobbying was visible earlier in March 2025 when the Cement Industry Federation (CIF) publicly addressed the government on the issue ahead of its next budget. It asked that carbon leakage be addressed in the form of an import tax to protect the local cement and lime sector. Cement and lime imports from Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam and Japan are particularly seen as an issue. The government review into carbon leakage started in 2023 and is due to report back at some point in 2025, most likely after the parliamentary election in May 2025.

Another big sector news story to note is the ongoing acquisition of the cementitious division of the Buckeridge Group of Companies (BGC) by Cement Australia that was revealed in December 2024. Unsurprisingly, the European Commission (EC) approved the deal in late March 2025. Cement Australia’s parent companies Holcim and Heidelberg Materials are headquartered in Europe, but the EC concluded that the planned transaction was unlikely to dampen competition in Europe. The verdict of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is likely to be far more telling. It closed taking submissions on the proposed deal in late February 2025 and plans to release an update in May 2025.

The ACCC’s market inquiries letter reported that Cement Australia wants to run BCG Cement. However, under the acquisition proposal, BGC Quarries and BGC Asphalt will be acquired and operated by a new 50:50 joint venture between Holcim and Heidelberg Materials, which will operate as a production joint venture in respect of aggregates. Holcim and Heidelberg Materials have suggested taking four ready-mixed concrete (RMC) plants each in the greater Perth area. Finally, one RMC plant at Wangara could be divested due to the close proximity of existing plants run by Holcim and Heidelberg Materials. Whether this is what actually happens remains to be seen.

Finally, Holcim flagged-up Australia this week as one of the regions it intends to derive ‘profitable growth’ from after the planned spin-off of the US business. This approach is in line with the hunt by the big building materials companies for new growth markets as the cost of merger and acquisition activity in the US has risen. CRH, for example, bought a majority stake in AdBri in mid-2024. Further merger and acquisition activity in the cement sector in Australia seems less likely given its relative small size. Yet the higher economic growth forecast for the country compared to Europe is likely to keep multinationals interested.

UK: Union officials have raised concerns over 41 job losses at Tarmac’s Dunbar cement plant in East Lothian, which represents about a third of its workforce. The plant has been described as ‘critically important to the Scottish economy,’ according to The Scotsman newspaper. Trade union GMB Scotland has called on the Scottish government to intervene, warning that the cuts would harm local communities and Scotland’s manufacturing base. The 0.7Mt/yr plant has reportedly entered talks with workers over the potential job cuts, but questioned have been raised over whether production levels can be maintained after job losses.

GMB Scotland organiser Stephen McGhee said “This may be the first step in deindustrialising the site with work, skills and taxes going elsewhere. With the widespread use of concrete, this would be another blow to Scotland’s manufacturing base and workforce.”

Cement producers based in North America and Europe reported stable revenues and growing earnings in 2024. Revenue growth at scale could be found in India and Sub-Saharan Africa. Notably, India-based UltraTech Cement’s sales volumes of cement surpassed those of Holcim’s. Yet, the European-headquartered multinationals were mostly happy due to increased earnings. Holcim lauded record performance in 2024, for example, and Heidelberg Materials reflected upon “a very good financial year.” This review of financial results looks at selected large heavy building materials companies, outside of China, that have released financial results so far.

Graph 1: Sales revenue from selected cement producers in 2023 and 2024. Source: Company reports. Note: Figures calculated for UltraTech Cement, consolidated data from Ambuja Cement used for Adani Cement.

Holcim’s net sales may have dropped on a direct basis from 2023 to 2024 but its focus is on earnings. Its recurring earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) rose by 4% year-on-year to US$1.31bn in 2024 from US$1.26bn in 2023. And the changing nature of where its earnings come from in recent years has led to the impending spin-off of the US business, scheduled to occur by the end of the first half of 2025. The company will be called Amrize and will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with an additional listing on the SIX Swiss Exchange. By product line, sales were down for cement, ready-mixed concrete (RMX) and aggregates, but they were up for the group’s Solutions & Products division. Despite this earnings were up for all four product lines. By region sales fell in North America, Europe and Asia, Middle East & Africa. They rose in Latin America. For reference, North America and Europe are the group’s two biggest segments.

Heidelberg Materials’ sales revenue remained stable in 2024 on a direct basis, although it dipped slightly on a like-for-like comparison. Its result from current operations before depreciation and amortisation (RCOBD) grew by 6% to US$3.4bn. Geographically, revenue in Europe and Asia Pacific fell. RCOBD increased, notably, by 19% to US$4.80bn in North America. It grew everywhere else apart from Africa-Mediterranean-Western Asia. As is becoming customary for Heidelberg Materials, it made a point of highlighting its sustainability progress. This includes demonstrating progress towards its sustainable revenue target and reminding markets that the delivery of its first carbon captured net-zero cement evoZero product is planned during 2025. The group plans to release its 2024 full annual report at the end of March 2025.

Graph 2: Cement sales volumes from selected cement producers in 2023 and 2024. Source: Company reports. Note: Annualised sales volumes provided for CRH, figures calculated for UltraTech Cement.

CRH’s strength in North America gave it both rising revenues and earnings. Sales revenue from its Americas Materials Solutions division reported 5% growth to US$16.2bn in 2024. Adjusted earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) sprung up by 22% to US$3.75bn. Revenue growth was attributed to price increases and acquisitions. Earnings growth was pinned on growth across all regions, pricing, cost management, operational efficiency and gains on land asset sales. Despite this, reported volumes in the division were down in 2024. The group’s International Solutions division performed more in line with its competitors, with revenue down slightly but earnings up. Lastly, CRH’s annualised sales volumes of cement grew in 2024. This is likely primarily due to the group’s acquisition of assets in Australia.

Cemex had a tougher time of it in 2024, compared to the previous three companies, with both sales revenues and earnings down. Sales and earnings were down on a direct basis for each of its three main regions – Mexico, the US, and Europe, Middle East, and Africa - although the picture was better in Mexico on a like-for-like basis. Sales volumes of cement, RMX and aggregates were either static or down in each of these areas. In the US the group may have been unlucky as it took an earnings hit from four hurricanes and a deep freeze in Texas. Group earnings improved in the fourth quarter of 2024. In spite of this it introduced ‘Project Cutting Edge’ in February 2025, a three-year, US$350m cost saving exercise.

The first takeaway from UltraTech Cement’s performance in 2024 is that a second (mainly) national producer has overtaken the multinationals. This happened with several China-based cement producers over the last decade. Now it has occurred in India with Ultratech Cement. It reported sales volumes of 120Mt in the 2024 calendar year. Shifting to the Indian financial calendar, Ultratech Cement ‘s revenue rose slightly in the nine months to 31 December 2024 but its new profit fell by 19% year-on-year to US$458m. Local press has blamed this on weak price realisations despite sales volumes growing. At the same time its energy costs have fallen so far in its 2025 financial year. Adani Cement, meanwhile, reported strong growth in both revenue and earnings in the 12 months to 31 December 2024. It too is likely to become one of the world’s largest cement producers by sales volumes by 2030, outside of China, if it follows-through on its expansion targets.

Finally, Dangote Cement reminded us all what growth really looks like as the Nigerian market started to rebound. Sales revenue increased by 62% to US$2.39bn and EBITDA by 56% to US$591m. Despite high domestic interest rates in Nigeria the group managed to grow its sales volumes of cement. Elsewhere in Sub-Saharan Africa sales volumes declined a little due to bad weather conditions in Tanzania and election uncertainties in Senegal and South Africa.

The importance of the US market for many multinational cement producers continued in 2024. However, this reliance on one place can carry risks, as Cemex’s results seem to suggest. Another reminder of this occurred this week when the US government imposed 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico. The Portland Cement Association said in a statement, “The US cement industry would like to work with the administration to address federal laws and regulations that prevent American cement companies from increasing production, making it necessary for the US to import some 20% of its total cement consumption annually - including from Canada and Mexico.” Elsewhere, markets are changing as mega-markets such as India and Sub-Saharan Africa unleash their potential. China-based Huaxin Cement, for example, may start to gain a place on international round-ups like this one in 2025 when it completes its acquisition of Lafarge Africa.

Ireland: CRH recorded a 2% year-on-year increase in sales to US$35.6bn in 2024, with net income rising by 15% to US$3.5bn during the period. The producer's earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) grew by 12% year-on-year to US$6.9bn.

In the fourth quarter of 2024, the company's sales rose by 2% year-on-year to US$8.9bn, while its net income increased by 24% to US$700m and its EBITDA by 12% to US$1.8bn.

CRH invested US$5bn in mergers and acquisitions during 2024. It maintains a positive outlook for the 2025 financial year, forecasting a net income of US$3.7 – US$4.1bn and an EBITDA of US$7.3 – US$7.7bn.

Holcim revealed the board members for its proposed North America business this week. Former group CEO Jan Jenisch was confirmed as the designated chair and CEO. He will be joined by nine directors chosen from sectors including construction, manufacturing, industrial operations and financial services. Notably, current Holcim director Jürg Oleas will be joining Jenisch at the new company. He previously worked as the head of GEA Group and had senior stints at ABB and the Alstom Group.

The group’s decision to split its business in North America from that in the rest of the world has been presented as a piece of financial engineering designed to increase earnings, margins and increase the value of the business. Markets in the US and Europe have diverged in recent years, with the former growing and the latter slowing in comparison. Splitting the business should, in theory, allow both companies to grow at their own pace. However, the spin-off company in North America will remain linked to Europe as it will be listed at both the New York Stock Exchange and the SIX Swiss Exchange. The latter is for the benefit of European investors. The separation is expected by the end of the first half 2025, subject to shareholder and customary approvals.

Naturally, other companies are also chasing growth in North America. Titan Cement announced this week that its US-based subsidiary, Titan America, has filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of a proposed initial public offering (IPO). Yet, the company said that the offering is subject to market conditions. As such it couldn’t say when it might happen, how big it might be or much else. Back in May 2024 the group said it was going to list Titan America in the US to “...facilitate the group’s and Titan America’s future growth and unlock new opportunities.” The IPO was intended to be of a minority stake without creating any large-scale tax issues. At this time the transaction was planned to be completed in early 2025.

Titan’s sales share in North America has remained similar from 2018 to 2023 at around 55%. Holcim’s, by comparison, grew to 39% in 2023 from 22% in 2018. This is due to big acquisitions in the US such as Firestone Building Products in 2021 as it built up its lightweight building materials segment. The size of the two companies’ operations in North America are also different. Holcim reported net sales in the region of over US$11bn in 2023. Titan reported net sales of just under US$1.5bn.

Ireland-based CRH moved its stock market listings to the US earlier than both Holcim and Titan. It completed the transition of its primary listing to the New York Stock Exchange in mid-2023, although it too retains a listing in Europe, at the London Stock Exchange in its case. Yet analysts have started to wonder whether the company might spin-off its businesses outside the US. As reported by the Irish Times, Bank of America analysts reckon that the non-US parts of the company now represent only 16% of the US$82bn concern. For sanity’s sake this is still a US$10bn-plus sized company! Although other commentators did wonder why CRH might have bought assets in Australia in 2024 if it was seriously considering making changes on this scale anytime soon.

Despite all this attention on the US and North America by some of the multinational cement producers, it is worth remembering that markets change over time. Europe may not look so hot right now but it is unlikely to stay like this. The head of Heidelberg Materials, for example, said in early 2024 that his company wasn’t planning a split in the US because it was focusing on decarbonisation. This may prove prescient in the longer term if Europe sticks to its sustainability goals. FInally, the US isn’t the only place where cement companies are attempting to build their value in growth markets. It was also reported this week that JSW Cement had obtained approval from the Securities and Exchange Board of India to proceed with its IPO.

Ireland: CRH has appointed Alan Connolly as its Interim Chief Financial Officer (CFO). The move follows the appointment of Jim Mintern, the current CFO, as Group CEO from January 2025. Recruitment is ongoing for a permanent CFO.

Connolly is a chartered accountant who holds over three decades of finance experience working at CRH. He has held several senior finance roles across the company’s European and Americas businesses. He most recently worked as the Director of Strategic Finance. Prior to this he was the Finance and Performance Director of Europe Materials, CFO of Global Building Products and Director of Group Finance. Before working for CRH, Connolly was an auditor at KPMG.

On 6 November 2024, Donald Trump appeared before followers in Florida, US, to declare victory in the 47th US presidential election. A sea of red baseball caps reflected the promise of the former president, now once again president-elect, to Make America Great Again. What Trump’s triumph means for the cement industry is not so straightforward. One lesson of President Trump’s 2017 – 2021 tenure as 45th president is that a Trump presidency comes with winners and losers.

Alongside the international heads of state posting their congratulations to Trump via social media was the Portland Cement Association (PCA), which represents US cement producers. In a post to LinkedIn, it took the chance to set out its priorities for the upcoming presidency, set to commence on 20 January 2025. These include collaborating on ‘market‐based initiatives’ to further reduce US cement’s CO₂ emissions, addressing ‘regulatory burdens’ that currently hinder the uptake of alternative fuels (AF) and ensuring favourable policies and funding for the use of alternative cements under federal transport programmes, which are up for renewal in 2026, as well as collaborating on carbon capture, utilisation and storage.

The post was suitably diplomatic for an organisation that will have to work with the incoming administration for the next four years. Reading the policy priorities against some of Trump’s campaign promises, however, they may be more pointed. As part of his plan to stimulate economic growth, Trump has proposed an unspecified reduction of the ‘regulatory burden’ of environmental standards. He also purports to want to replace renewables with increased use of fossil fuels – in direct opposition to the PCA’s goal to slash the US cement industry’s coal and petcoke reliance from 60% to 10% by 2050. The PCA’s stance is not merely ideological: its roadmap is founded on the legally-binding Paris Agreement on climate change mitigation. Trump, who considers the Paris Agreement a ‘disaster,’ has the stated aim of withdrawing the US from the treaty – for a second time!

The PCA included a positive note that “We can all agree that the ultimate goal of our industry and the government is to best serve the American people.” In case there were any doubt as to what it feels best serves those people, it concluded that it will work with all federal officials to help communities in the US to build ‘a more resilient, sustainable’ country.

Producers themselves, in the US and many other markets, had been finalising first-half or nine-month financial results when the Trump news broke. Now came half-anticipated strategy discussions – and a surprise: in market after market, trading in cement stocks opened on the up. Ireland-based CRH’s share price spiked by 15%, before settling on a rise of 6% day-on-day. Mexico-based Cemex’s rose by 7% and Switzerland-based Holcim’s by 5%. Investors, clearly, glimpsed opportunity in uncertainty for these US-involved operators.

Trump’s campaign successfully positioned him as the disruptive outsider, despite being the known (or, at least, known-to-be-unpredictable) quantity of the two candidates. His promise to Americans was increased affordability; to corporations, deregulation. Either way, he stands to overhaul the past four years’ policy on the economy. All of this may keep Wall Street high-ballers placing their bets on Cemex or CRH, or on Holcim North America after it eventually joins them on the New York Stock Exchange. The prospect of more money in homebuyers’ pockets is attractive, especially to allied sectors like property development, where Trump himself worked for over 40 years. The cement industry, meanwhile, will be taking a hard look at what the Trump proposition might mean for its market.

US Geological Survey (USGS) data tracks a favourable market trend under the present Biden Administration – to date – for a US cement industry that has also grown in production terms. Consumption was 120Mt in 2023, up by 14% over the three-year-period from 2020, while production was 91Mt, up by 4% over the same period. President Biden has signed into law two major pieces of legislation – the Inflation Reduction Act and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act – with a combined value of US$1.94tn in additional public spending, to President Trump’s none. However, the Republican president previously proposed investing an additional US$200bn in 2018.

Trump voters may have perused the USGS’ most recent monthly cement figures, for July 2024, before casting their votes. The figures recorded a 5.2% year-on-year decline in total cement shipments in the year-to-date, to 58.6Mt. Both Eagle Materials and Italy-based Buzzi noted a recent lack of growth in US sales volumes in their latest financial results. Another possibly alarming trend for the industry – and anyone with a protectionist mindset - is the growth of imports, which rose from 14.8Mt in 2019 to 26Mt in 2023.

A defining feature of Trump’s original presidency, alongside Covid-19 lockdown, was his still-ongoing trade wars. We can expect Trump to resume his roll-out of new tariffs as soon as he can. This might include cement plant equipment produced in other jurisdictions, such as the EU. Compared to the roster of goods he previously denied entry to the US, however, 26Mt/yr of cement will be less easy to wrangle with in a country with a domestic shortfall of 29Mt/yr.

Whatever happens in politics, the US cement sector remains very strong, with historied local ownership and some of the most innovative plants in the industry globally. Global players continue to seek to maximise their US-facing presence, as evidenced by Brazil-based Votorantim Cimentos’ contemplation of an initial public offering (IPO) for Votorantim Cimentos North America, announced on 7 November 2024. For the industry, the day-to-day grind – and pyroprocess – goes on.

After all, Trump did not enact many of his more disruptive proposals, such as building a Mexican border wall, after his win in 2016. See Global Cement’s analysis of that proposal here. But even this record is an unreliable guide for what to expect in 2025 – 2029. Not only did Trump himself win the popular mandate this time around, but his allies also gained majorities in the House of Representatives and Senate, comprising the US legislature. This betokens a different pace and scale of possible changes.

In 10 weeks’ time, the US cement sector will be lobbying an entirely new regime. Now is the time for it to prepare whatever arguments will appeal to incoming lawmakers to allow it make the best of such opportunities as may be available.

Philippines: CRH is considering selling its cement business in the Philippines. The company has engaged UBS Group to assess investors' interest in acquiring assets, with negotiations ongoing. In 2019, CRH attempted to sell its Philippines cement business for US$2 - 3bn as part of an asset portfolio optimisation, but the divestment is reportedly now worth ‘significantly’ less due to a ‘more complex’ business environment, according to AK&M Information Agency.

CRH first entered the Philippine market in 2015 by acquiring Republic Cement, the second largest cement producer in the Philippines.